Last updated: 2024-07-01

Checks: 7 0

Knit directory: toolbox/

This reproducible R Markdown analysis was created with workflowr (version 1.7.1). The Checks tab describes the reproducibility checks that were applied when the results were created. The Past versions tab lists the development history.

R Markdown file: up-to-date

Great! Since the R Markdown file has been committed to the Git repository, you know the exact version of the code that produced these results.

Environment: empty

Great job! The global environment was empty. Objects defined in the global environment can affect the analysis in your R Markdown file in unknown ways. For reproduciblity it’s best to always run the code in an empty environment.

Seed: set.seed(20220228)

The command set.seed(20220228) was run prior to running the code in the R Markdown file. Setting a seed ensures that any results that rely on randomness, e.g. subsampling or permutations, are reproducible.

Session information: recorded

Great job! Recording the operating system, R version, and package versions is critical for reproducibility.

Cache: none

Nice! There were no cached chunks for this analysis, so you can be confident that you successfully produced the results during this run.

File paths: relative

Great job! Using relative paths to the files within your workflowr project makes it easier to run your code on other machines.

Repository version: 6537266

Great! You are using Git for version control. Tracking code development and connecting the code version to the results is critical for reproducibility.

The results in this page were generated with repository version 6537266. See the Past versions tab to see a history of the changes made to the R Markdown and HTML files.

Note that you need to be careful to ensure that all relevant files for the analysis have been committed to Git prior to generating the results (you can use wflow_publish or wflow_git_commit). workflowr only checks the R Markdown file, but you know if there are other scripts or data files that it depends on. Below is the status of the Git repository when the results were generated: 


Ignored files:
    Ignored:    .Rproj.user/

Unstaged changes:
    Modified:   data/toolbox_evidence.xlsx
    Modified:   output/figure_map.pdf

Note that any generated files, e.g. HTML, png, CSS, etc., are not included in this status report because it is ok for generated content to have uncommitted changes.

These are the previous versions of the repository in which changes were made to the R Markdown (analysis/table_examples.Rmd) and HTML (public/table_examples.html) files. If you’ve configured a remote Git repository (see ?wflow_git_remote), click on the hyperlinks in the table below to view the files as they were in that past version.

File Version Author Date Message
html c5033f2 Kozyreva 2024-05-13 Build site.
html 466dd67 Kozyreva 2024-05-13 publication update
html e7e6f57 Kozyreva 2024-04-24 Build site.
html 8892615 Kozyreva 2024-04-24 small update to the title and evidence table
html 5bae2a2 Kozyreva 2024-02-20 Build site.
html 1a1a155 Kozyreva 2023-11-30 minor updates
Rmd 5be9264 Kozyreva 2023-11-24 what should be the final version of the toolbox 2.0
html 5be9264 Kozyreva 2023-11-24 what should be the final version of the toolbox 2.0
html 22a40df Kozyreva 2023-10-24 v2 updates
html 663ae9c Kozyreva 2023-10-24 Build site.
Rmd 3efec23 Kozyreva 2023-10-24 wflow_publish(files = files, republish = TRUE, delete_cache = TRUE,
Rmd c2b8b90 Kozyreva 2023-10-12 v2 branch update
html c2b8b90 Kozyreva 2023-10-12 v2 branch update

This part of the online supplement provides examples for each intervention types included in our toolbox. Please note that these are not exaustive examples and implementation of each intervention type can take on different forms.

Accuracy Prompts

Version Author Date
663ae9c Kozyreva 2023-10-24

To the best of your knowledge, is the above headline accurate?

◯ Yes

◯ No

Source: A reproduction of a treatment condition from Pennycook et al. (2020), Study 2 Materials.

Debunking

Version Author Date
663ae9c Kozyreva 2023-10-24

Source: The Debunking Handbook, 2020.

Rebuttals of science denialism

Florian Hantzsch (Interviewer): Mr. Stefan Müller from the Neustaedter Vaccine-Sceptics, how safe is the vaccine against dysomeria?’

Science denialism. Stefan Müller (Science Denier 1): ‘The lack of safety is an important issue with the dysomeria vaccine. The side effects and risks of the vaccine are incalculable. As a patient, you do not know how the body reacts to the vaccine before administration. Even if you feel healthy immediately after the shot, harmful substances may have entered your body. Doctors cannot guarantee in advance that there will not be any complications. In my opinion, you cannot expect any fellow citizen to vaccinate as long as the vaccine is not 100% safe. Surely, it is not too much to ask that a product injected into a healthy human be 100% safe.’

Florian Hantzsch (Interviewer): ‘Thank you, Mr. Müller. Mr. Jürgen Schmidt from the Health Office in Neustadt, how do you respond to that?’

Rebuttal. Jürgen Schmidt (Science Advocate 1): ‘Mr. Müller demands 100% safety from the vaccine against dysomeria. In science, this argument is called impossible expectation. It is an impossible expectation because science can never guarantee 100% safety for any medical product, neither for aspirin nor for heart surgery. Any treatment poses a residual risk of complications for patients either during or after treatment. The scientific evidence is clear: The vaccine against dysomeria is a safe way to avoid the disease. The risk of dysomeria by far exceeds the risk from vaccination. This is why we, the Health Office in Neustadt, recommend the vaccination against the DS virus for citizens of all ages. And please let me add the following regarding the safety of the vaccine: We follow a very strict protocol to ensure the high quality of vaccines in the Federal States. This also is demonstrated by the fact that every batch of the vaccine against dysomeria constantly is monitored and independently screened by official control laboratories.’

Source: A transcript of messages delivered by deniers and advocates in a video used as a treatment condition, available in the Supplementary Information in Schmid et al. (2020). Note: original materials were in German.

Friction

Version Author Date
663ae9c Kozyreva 2023-10-24

Please explain how you know that the headline is true or false.

Source: A reproduction of a treatment condition with a friction sentence taken from Fazio (2020).

Inoculation

Version Author Date
663ae9c Kozyreva 2023-10-24

Version Author Date
663ae9c Kozyreva 2023-10-24

Source: Screenshots from the instructional video on the use of Emotional Language. All videos can be viewed on the Inoculation Science website.

Relevant scientific article: Rozenbeek et al., 2022.

Lateral Reading

Version Author Date
663ae9c Kozyreva 2023-10-24

Source: A poster to remind students to implement this strategy when they come across an unfamiliar source. This poster and more materials available on the Civic Online Reasoning website.

Relevant scientific article: Wineburg et al., 2022.

Media-Literacy Tips

Version Author Date
663ae9c Kozyreva 2023-10-24

Source: Pictured ten “Tips to spot fake news” created and made accessible by Facebook.

Relevant scientific article: Guess et al, 2020.

Minimal Media-Literacy Tips

Think carefully about the news with these tips

Version Author Date
663ae9c Kozyreva 2023-10-24

Source: A reproduction of the treatment condition with minimal media literacy tips from Arechar et al. (2023).

Refutations and Social Norms

Claim. “The debate about how many refugees Australia should take in continues. The main aim is to keep refugees safe, and while there is some immediate cost, Jack Western from the Australian Refugee Resource Centre argued today that there was no reason to be concerned about economic consequences:”Within a short period of time, most refugees integrate into society, and a moderate increase in refugees will have a positive impact on the Australian economy”. Western claimed that within two decades, a slight increase in refugee intake would boost the Australian economy by an estimated 2%. Accepting a slightly increased uptake of refugees will have a positive impact on the Australian economy within 20 years.”

Refutation. Later today, Dr Michael Smith from the Centre for Independent Studies strongly refuted earlier statements regarding an economic benefit associated with asylum seekers. According to Smith, recent modelling by the Centre shows that “there is absolutely no economic gain to be expected in the foreseeable future by increasing the intake of refugees in Australia. Evidence also comes from Germany, where the intake of asylum seekers over the years has been an economic drain. Unfortunately, the reality is that each additional refugee comes at a certain long-term cost.

Claim-endorsement norm. Before you re-rate your belief in the original claim, let’s first have a look at what your peers said. We surveyed a representative sample of 25 UWA students, asking them how they rated their belief in the claim. The original claim was: “Accepting a slightly increased uptake of refugees will have a positive impact on the Australian economy.” This is how your peers rated their belief in the claim. The below graph shows their claim endorsement on a scale from 0 (confidently disagree with claim) to 100 (confidently agree with claim):

Version Author Date
663ae9c Kozyreva 2023-10-24

Source: Refutation and Claim-endorsement norm in the form of a graph taken from Ecker et al. (2022), Supplementary information.

Source-Credibility Labels

Version Author Date
663ae9c Kozyreva 2023-10-24

Source: 1-to-5 star trustworthiness ratings applied to news headlines in Celadin et al. (2023).

Warning and Fact-Checking Labels

Version Author Date
663ae9c Kozyreva 2023-10-24

Source: A false headline with the fact-checking label with “Rated False” tag from Online appendix A in Clayton et al. (2020).

Privacy policy - Imprint/Provider Identification


R version 4.3.1 (2023-06-16 ucrt)
Platform: x86_64-w64-mingw32/x64 (64-bit)
Running under: Windows 10 x64 (build 19043)

Matrix products: default


locale:
[1] LC_COLLATE=English_United States.utf8 
[2] LC_CTYPE=English_United States.utf8   
[3] LC_MONETARY=English_United States.utf8
[4] LC_NUMERIC=C                          
[5] LC_TIME=English_United States.utf8    

time zone: Europe/Berlin
tzcode source: internal

attached base packages:
[1] grid      stats     graphics  grDevices utils     datasets  methods  
[8] base     

other attached packages:
[1] vembedr_0.1.5   png_0.1-8       here_1.0.1      pacman_0.5.1   
[5] workflowr_1.7.1

loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
 [1] jsonlite_1.8.7    highr_0.10        compiler_4.3.1    promises_1.2.1   
 [5] Rcpp_1.0.11       stringr_1.5.0     git2r_0.32.0      callr_3.7.3      
 [9] later_1.3.1       jquerylib_0.1.4   yaml_2.3.7        fastmap_1.1.1    
[13] R6_2.5.1          knitr_1.43        tibble_3.2.1      rprojroot_2.0.3  
[17] bslib_0.5.1       pillar_1.9.0      rlang_1.1.1       utf8_1.2.3       
[21] cachem_1.0.8      stringi_1.7.12    httpuv_1.6.11     xfun_0.40        
[25] getPass_0.2-2     fs_1.6.3          sass_0.4.7        cli_3.6.1        
[29] magrittr_2.0.3    ps_1.7.5          digest_0.6.33     processx_3.8.2   
[33] rstudioapi_0.15.0 lifecycle_1.0.3   vctrs_0.6.3       evaluate_0.21    
[37] glue_1.6.2        whisker_0.4.1     fansi_1.0.4       rmarkdown_2.24   
[41] httr_1.4.7        tools_4.3.1       pkgconfig_2.0.3   htmltools_0.5.6